Using a hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making model for the strategic restoriation of a seasonal-urban river

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate professor, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, University college of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 MSc in Water Resources Engineering, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, University college of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the best strategy for restoration of a seasonal-urban river. Brainstorming sessions were held and SWOT method was used to determine the strategies and effective criteria. Then, the strategies were ranked by using the hybrid model of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Modified Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution and the best strategy was selected. In this study, two basic goals of river's restoration were considered separately which are restoring the quality and quantity of water flow and recharging its aquifer and securing and reduce the risk of floods. The results showed that the best strategy for restoring the quality and quantity of aquifer and water flow is balancing the sources and uses of river and groundwater. On other hand, for flood risk management, only management strategy (flood plain management including control of development and construction) was recognized as the best strategy. The results showed that for restoration of a seasonal-urban river, the management strategies have higher priority compared to structural strategies. The proposed framework of this paper can be used in the strategic management of river restoration in other seasonal-urban rivers.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Hohensinner S, Lager B, Sonnlechner C, Haidvogl G, Gierlinger S, Schmid M, et al. Changes in water and land: the reconstructed Viennese riverscape from 1500 to the present. Water History. 2013;5(2):145-72.
  2. RESTORE. River by Design: Rethinking development and river restoration. Environment Agancy, Horizon House, Deanery Road. 2013.
  3. Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr et al. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of applied ecology 42, no. 2. 2005;208-217.
  4. Bradshaw A.D. Underlying principles of restoration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 1996;53:3–9.
  5. Woolsey S, Capelli F, Gonser T, Hoehn E, Hostmann M, Junker B, et al. A strategy to assess river restoration success. Freshwater Biology. 2007;52(4):752-69.
  6. Zhao Y, Yang Z, Xu F. Theoretical framework of the urban river restoration planning. Environmental Informatics Archives. 2007;5:241-7.
  7. Vietz, Geoff J., Ian D. Rutherfurd, Tim D. Fletcher, and Christopher J. Walsh. Thinking outside the channel: Challenges and opportunities for protection and restoration of stream morphology in urbanizing catchments. Landscape and Urban Planning 145. 2016:34-44.
  8. Banihabib ME, Jamali FS. Determining approaches for controlling debris flows in an urban river. The third national conference on flood management and engineering with the approach of urban floods. 2015. [Persian]
  9. Ataei M. Multi criteria decision making. Shahrood University of Technology. 2009. [Persian]
  10.  Shabestari MH, Banihabib ME. Ranking of Agricultural Water Demand Management Strategies in Arid Regions by Hybrid Model of AHP and M-TOPSIS. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture. 2015;29(1):101-115. [Persian]
  11.  Ezzati M, Banihabib ME. Algorithm to determine the best strategy for flood management. The third national conference on flood management and engineering with the approach of urban floods. 2015. [Persian]
  12.  Azarnivand A, Banihabib ME. Planning and strategic management of water resources in Lake Urmia basin in accordance with sustainable development. Second National Conference on Agricultural Sustainable Development and Healthy Environment. 2013. [Persian]
  13. Banihabib ME, Laghabdoost A. Flood Management Options Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Evaluation and Mixed Criteria. Journal of Irrigation and Water engineering. 2013;14(4):72-82. [Persian]
  14. Aczél, J, Saaty T. Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments. Journal of mathematical Psychology. 1983;27(1):93-102.
  15. Saaty TL, Vargas LG. Inconsistency and rank preservation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1984;28(2):205-214.
  16. The program of restoration and balance of groundwater resources of the country. Department of Water and Abfa. Office of operating systems and water conservation. 2014. [Persian]
  17. Documents of multi-sectoral water resources management. the basic steps necessary to achieve the goals predicted in documents of sectoral and multi-sectoral development. 2005. [Persian]
  18. Journal of Iranian Water Policy Research Institute. 2013;4:5-13. [Persian]
Iranian journal of Ecohydrology
Volume 4, Issue 4
January 2018
Pages 1105-1116

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 16 May 2017
  • Revise Date: 24 July 2017
  • Accept Date: 01 July 2017
  • First Publish Date: 22 December 2017
  • Publish Date: 22 December 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics