Assessment of future runoff trends under multiple climate change scenarios in the Gamasiab river basin

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Watershed managment

2 Geography Department,Hormozgan University,Bandar Abbass,Islamic Republic of Iran

3 Department of Irrigation and Reclamation, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology,College of Agriculture & Natural Resources,University of Tehran, Karaj

4 Department of Watershed management and range management, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Hormozgan University, Hormozgan

Abstract

One of the natural characteristics of the Gamasiab River is the probability of occurrence of the flood and its hazard. Hydrological studies under climate change conditions are required to organize and manage it. Because of the necessity of using CMIP5 series models in new researches due to their high accuracy and lack of research using these models in our country, in the present study, four models of CMPI5 series and two scenarios RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 were used for the near future (2049-2020 AD) and the far future (2070-2099 AD). The results show the annual rainfall in five stations would vary from 52.8 to -31.6 percent according to the scenarios and different time periods. The average minimum and maximum monthly temperature at Kermanshah station increases to 2.75 ° C and 2.15 C°, and at Hamadan station, increases to 3.43 C° and 4.26 C°, respectively according to different scenarios. The SWAT model was used to simulate the hydrologic regime. The results while confirming the effectiveness of the SWAT model for simulating of river discharge, showed that changes in runoff rate using the output of the CSIRO-k3.6.0 model under different scenarios would indicate a change from 17.8 to -42.3 percent

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]. IPCC expert meeting report. towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climatechange, impacts, and response strategies. 19–21 September, 2007 Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands
[2]. Herting, E. and J. Jacobeit., 2008,“Downscaling Future Climate change: Temperature scenarios for the Mediterrnean Area”, Global and Planetary hange 63. 127- 131.
[3]. Ozkul, S., 2009,“Assessment of climate change eifects in Aegean River Basins: The case Of Gediz Buyuk Menders Basins”, J. climate change
[4]. Harmsen, E. W., Miller, N. L., Schelgel, N. J. and Gonzalez, J.E.2009,“Seasonal climate change Impactes on Evaportranspiration, Percipitation deficit and crop Yield in Puer Rico”,J. Of Agricultural Water Management, 96. 1085- 1095.
 
[5]. Babaean A, Najafinik Z, Abbasi F, Nohandan M, Adab H. 2009. "Assessment of the country's climate change during the period 2010-2039 using the general circulation model of ECHO-G. Geography and Development,2009; 16: 152-135.
[6]. Revelle R. R, Waggoner P. E.1983. Effects of carbon dioxideinduced climate change on water supplies in western of United States. Climate changing Nat. Acad. Washangton D. C. 1983.
[7]. Wilby R, Harris I. A frame work for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: low flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK. Water Resources Research. 2006; 42
[8]. Jahanbakhsh S, Khorshid Dust A.M, Alinejed M.H, Purasghar F. The Impact of Climate Change on Temperature and Precipitation Considering the Uncertainty of Climate Models and Scenarios(Case study of Urmia Shahr-e Chah Basin). Hydrogeomorphology Journal. 2016; 7: 107-122. [Persian]
[9]. Kamal A.R, Massah Bavani A.R. Evaluation of uncertainty of AR4-AOGCM models and hydrologic models in estimating temperature, precipitation and the runoff of Qaraosso basin under climate change. Journal of Water Research of Iran. 2011; 5(9): 39-50. [Persian]
[10]. Eghdamirad S, Johnson F, Woldemeskel F, Sharma A. Quantifying the sources of uncertainty in upper air climate variables. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2016; 27;121(8):3859-74.
[11]. Elashamy M. E., Wheater, H. S., Huntingford, C. Evaluation of the rainfall Companent of Weather generator for climate change Studies. Journal of Hydrology. 2005; 326: 1-24.
[12]. Schimidli, H, Goodess C. M., Frei C, Haylouk M. R., Schmith S. Statistical and dynamical downscaling Precipitation: An Evaluation and Camparison of scenario for the European Alps. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007; 112: 1-20.
[13]. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Stocker T.F, Qin G, Plattner M, Tignor S.K, Allen J, Boschung A, et al. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
[14]. Basheer A, Lu H, Omer A, Ali A, Abdelgader A. Impacts of climate change under CMIP5 RCP scenarios on the stream flow in the Dinder River and ecosystem habitats in Dinder National Park, Sudan. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2016; 20: 1331–1353.
[15]. Papadimitriou L, Koutroulis L, Grillakis M, Tsanis I. High-end climate change impact on European runoff and low flows – exploring the effects of forcing biases. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2016; 20: 1785–1808.
[16]. Hoang L, Lauri H, Kummu M, Koponen J, Michelle T, Vliet H, et al. Mekong River flow and hydrological extremes under climate change. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2016; 20: 3027–3041.
[17]. Arias R, Blanco M, Taboada-Castro M, Nunes J, Keizer J. Water Resources Response to Changes in Temperature, Rainfall and CO2 Concentration: A First Approach in NW Spain. Water. 2014; 6(10), 3049-3067; doi:10.3390/w6103049
 [18]. Saha P. P., Zeleke K, Hafeez M. Streamflow modeling in a fluctuant climate using SWAT: Yass River catchment in south eastern Australia. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2014; 71(12): 5241–5254
[19]. Xu H, Luo Y. Climate change and its impacts on river discharge in two climate regions in China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2015; 19, 4609–4618.
[20]. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
[21]. Ministry of Agriculture. Comprehensive Plan for the Recovery and Development of Agriculture and Natural Resources in the Karkheh and Dez River Basin. 1996;Volume 1, Surface Water, Planning and Support Deputy, Tehran.
[22]. Abbaspour K. 2007. User manual for SWAT-CUP, SWAT calibration and uncertainty analysis programs. Eawag: Swiss Fed. Inst. Of Aquat. Sci. and Technol. Du¨bendorf, Switzerland.
[23]. Neitsch S, Arnold L, Kiniry G, Williams J. Soil and Water Assessment Tool, Userʼs Manual, Version 2000-2002
[24]. Abbaspour K, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Klove B. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology. 2015; 524:733–752
[25]. Donizete R, Pereiraa A, Martinezb F, Pruskib D. Hydrological simulation in a basin of typical tropical climate and soil using the SWAT model part I: Calibration and validation tests. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 2016; 7: 14–37
[26]. Kepner W, Hernandez M, Semmens D, Goodrich D. The Use of Scenario Analysis to Assess Future Landscape Change on Watershed Condition in the Pacific Northwest (USA). Use of Landscape Sciences for the Assessment of Environmental Security. 2008; 237-261.
[27]. Wang L, Ranasinghe S, M van P, Gelder J, Vrijling K. Comparison of empirical statistical methods for downscaling daily climate projections from CMIP5 GCMs: a case study of the Huai River Basin, China. International journal of climatology Int. J. Climatol. 2016; 36: 145–164
 
[28]. Ho C, Stephenson D, Collins M, Ferro CAT, Brown S. Calibration strategies: a source of additional uncertainty in climate change projections. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2012; 93(1): 21–26.
[29]. Zahabiyun B, Goodarzi M, Massah A. Application of SWAT model in estimating basin runoff in future periods affected by climate change. Journal of Climatology Research. 2010; 3and4. [Persian]
[30]. Jones P, Hulme M, alculating regional climatic times series for temperature and precipitation: methods and illustrations. International journal of climatology. 1996; 16: 361-377
Iranian journal of Ecohydrology
Volume 5, Issue 3
October 2018
Pages 777-789

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 02 October 2017
  • Revise Date: 09 November 2017
  • Accept Date: 01 February 2018
  • First Publish Date: 23 September 2018
  • Publish Date: 23 September 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics