Modeling Ecosystem Production Services (Water Production) in Taleghan Middel Watershed

Document Type : Research Article


1 PhD. in Environmental Planning, Alborz Campus, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Iran


Modeling water resource systems is an essential part of the water resource planning and evaluation process. An assessment of how changes in water production and performance are important in the past and in the future. The InVEST model features ecosystem services in the form of maps with low input data levels, but high volume output data, and simplifies complex issues, thereby increasing the ability to solve problems. In the present study, the modeling of ecosystem production services (water production) in the middle of Taleghan watershed was investigated using InVEST Water Inventory. At first, the maps of the limiting root layer, the average annual rainfall, available water availability, land use and the boundary of the basin and sub-basins were entered as inputs of the model and maps of the amount of water produced in each sub-area Cubic meter/year), the approximate value of actual evapotranspiration with the fraction of rainfall per pixel, the actual evapotranspiration map in terms of (mm) per pixel is estimated, the estimated water production map per pixel (in millimeters per year) was obtained. Based on the calculations done by the model in total in the Taleghan Middel watershed, annual production of 200.9 million cubic meters of water is generated. It has the highest amount of water production under the Hasanjun area with 59.3 million cubic meters of water produced below the Donbalid, Zidast 1 and Zidasht 2 regions.


[1]. Jie X., Yu, X. Na, L. & Hao W. A.N.G. Spatial and temporal patterns of supply and demand balance of water supply services in the Dongjiang Lake Basin and its beneficiary areas. Journal of resources and ecology, 2015; 6(6), 386-396.‏
[2]. Liquete C., Maes, J., La Notte A., & Bidoglio G. Securing water as a resource for society: an ecosystem services perspective. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 2011; 11(3-4), 247-259.
[3]. Tao J.I.N., Xiaoyu Q. & Liyan H. Changes in grain production and the optimal spatial allocation of water resources in China. Journal of resources and ecology, 2016; 7(1), 28-35.‏ ‏
[4]. Sun S., Sun G., Cohen E., McNulty S.G., Caldwell P.V., Duan K. & Zhang Y. Projecting water yield and ecosystem productivity across the United States by linking an ecohydrological model to WRF dynamically downscaled climate data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2016; 20(2), 935.‏
[5]. Yang, X., Zhou, Z., Li, J., Fu, X., Mu, X., & Li, T. Trade-offs between carbon sequestration, soil retention and water yield in the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region of China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016; 26(10), 1449-1462.‏
[6]. Smith, E. J. The balance between public water supply and environmental needs. Water and Environment Journal, 1997; 11(1), 8-13.‏
[7]. Chen, M., Qin, X., Zeng, G., & Li, J. Impacts of human activity modes and climate on heavy metal “spread” in groundwater are biased. Chemosphere, 2016; 152, 439-445.‏
[8]. Liu, Y., Song, W., & Mu, F. Changes in ecosystem services associated with planting structures of cropland: A case study in Minle County in China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2017; 102, 10-20.‏
[9]. Fan, M., Shibata, H., & Chen, L. Spatial conservation of water yield and sediment retention hydrological ecosystem services across Teshio watershed, northernmost of Japan. Ecological Complexity, 2018; 33, 1-10.
[10].            Nkwonta, O. I., Dzwairo, B., Otieno, F. A. O., & Adeyemo, J. A. A review on water resources yield model. south african journal of chemical engineering, 2017; 23, 107-115.‏
[11].            Lang, Y., Song, W., & Deng, X. Projected land use changes impacts on water yields in the karst mountain areas of China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2017.
[12].            Baw-puh, F. On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 1981; 1, 002.
[13].            Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., & Walker, G.R. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water resources research, 2001; 37(3), 701-708.
[14].            Donohue, R.J., Roderick, M.L. & McVicar, T.R. Roots, storms and soil pores: Incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko’s hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology, 2012; 436, 35-50.
[15].            Jahangir, L. Air and Climatology and Mapping Studies (Case Study of Taleghan Watershed), Department of Rehabilitation of Arid and Mountainous Regions of the Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran; 2017.
[16].            Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah R.S. & Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998; 34(1), 73-89.
Volume 7, Issue 2
July 2020
Pages 411-419
  • Receive Date: 05 August 2019
  • Revise Date: 29 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 29 April 2020
  • First Publish Date: 21 June 2020
  • Publish Date: 21 June 2020