Investigation of effective variables in participatory planning in flood management in human settlements (Case study: Latian river basin)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Environmental Planning, Alborz Campus, University of Tehran.

2 Professor, Faculty of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran.

3 Environmental Planning , Faculty of Environment , College of Engineering , University of Tehran.

Abstract

Flood is defined as one of the most dangerous kinds of natural disasters which have caused massive damages, deaths, and economic conflicts on the Latian river basin. Participatory planning is one of the recent planning approaches that has been utilized by planners in a variety of fields such as urban planning, urbanism, environmental planning, and crisis management through the last decades. In this study, with the consideration of the recent investigations over this river basin, region specifications, habitants, and conditions of the Latian river basin, the effective variables of participatory planning were selected. Economical, social, governmental, cultural, and environmental variables were chosen as effective variables in participatory planning in flood management. These variables were then compared with each other, for which the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was used to compare and rank the variables because due to the multiplicity of expert opinions and the complete stability, it is possible to calculate the weight of each variable using the data normalization method. After analyzing the data, which are the results of the opinions of 21 experts, it can be concluded that the economic variable with the highest weight is in the highest rank compared to other variables, the governmental variable is placed after the economic variable in the second rank, the social and cultural variable is in the third place after the governmental variable, and the environmental variable is in the fourth place after the social and cultural variable.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]. Abarquez I, Murshed Z. Field Practitioners' Handbook. Bangkok: Asian Disaster Preparedness Center; 2004.
[2]. Abouei R, Danaeinia A. The role of public participation in reducing earthquake losses in historical urban fabrics. Journal of Iran architecture and repair. 2012 Jan 1(2): 53-62. [Persian].
[3]. Affeltranger B. Public participation in the design of local strategies for flood mitigation and control. Unesco; 2001.
[4]. Amoozad Khalili S, Rashidy A, Pirdashti H. Considering the role of public participation to improve urban crisis management and its effective elements based on Ragers’ public participation theory, Case study: Behshar city. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge (quarterly). 2018 Oct 10;8(3):255-68. [Persian].
[5]. Arnell NW, Gosling SN. The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change. 2016 Feb 1;134(3):387-401.
[6].  Asgharpour MJ. Multi-criteria decision making. Tehran: Tehran University Publications. 2008. [Persian].
[7]. Azmi A, Imani B. Public Participation of urban flood management. Urban flood management conference. 2011. [Persian].
[8]. Bester A. Results-based management in the United Nations Development System: progress and challenges. A report prepared for the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, for the Quadrennial Comprehensive Policy Review. 2012 Jul 10;2730.
[9]. Charalambous K, Bruggeman A, Giannakis E, Zoumides C. Improving public participation processes for the Floods directive and flood awareness: Evidence from Cyprus. Water. 2018 Jul;10(7):958.
[10]. Dufty N. How can we improve community engagement for floodplain management?. In Floodplain Management Australia National Conference,“Preparing for the Next Great Flood,” Newcastle, NSW, Australia, May 2017 May (pp. 16-19).
[11]. Edelenbos J, Van Buuren A, Roth D, Winnubst M. Stakeholder initiatives in flood risk management: exploring the role and impact of bottom-up initiatives in three ‘Room for the River’projects in the Netherlands. Journal of environmental planning and management. 2017 Jan 2;60(1):47-66.
[12]. EM-DAT CR. The international disaster database.
[13]. Ghahroudi Tali M, Majidi Heravi A, Abdoli E. Vulnerability of Urban Flooding Case Study: Tehran, Darake to Kan. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards. 2016 Mar 20;5(1):21-36.[Persian].
[14]. Ghorbani M, Ebrahimi F, Salajegheh A, Mohseni_saravi M. Social network analysis of local stakeholders in action plan for water resources co-management (Case study: Jajrood River in Latian watershed, Darbandsar village). Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering. 2014 Sep 10.
[15]. Hickey S, Mohan G. Participation: from tyranny to transformation: exploring new approaches to participation in development. Zed books; 2004.
[16]. Jahangiri K, Ostevar Izadkhah Y, Azin SA, Jarvandi F. Public Participation in Confronting Natural Disasters in Khuzestan Province: The Officials. Quarterly Scientific Journal of Rescue and Relief. 2011 Jan 10;2(4):0-. [Persian].
[17]. Jayaraman V. Space-based Disaster Risk Reduction: Indian Framework & Perspectives. Executives Development Programme (EDP) Space Applications Centre, Ahmedabad. 2013 Apr 27.
[18]. Kahraman C, editor. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications with recent developments. Springer Science & Business Media; 2008 Aug 9.
[19]. Kheradmand S, Seidou O, Konte D, Batoure MB. Evaluation of adaptation options to flood risk in a probabilistic framework. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 2018 Oct 1;19:1-6.
[20]. Kuhlicke C, Callsen I, Begg C. Reputational risks and participation in flood risk management and the public debate about the 2013 flood in Germany. Environmental Science & Policy. 2016 Jan 1;55:318-25.
[21]. Mirzaei R, Karami M, Kar AD, Abdoli A. Habitat quality assessment for the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) on the river Jajrood, Iran. Hystrix. 2009 Jan 1.
[22]. Murase M, Tyagi MA, Saalmueller MJ, Nagata MT. Organizing Community Participation for Integrated Flood Management. World Meteorological Organization. 2008.
[23]. Nekouyi Moghaddam M, Afshar Hossein Abadi Z, Ardalan A, Aminizadeh S. Women’s participation in natural disasters and accidents: a case study of Bam earthquake, Iran. Health in Emergencies and Disasters. 2016 Jul 10;1(4):201-8.
[24]. Nohegar A, Salehi E, Alavi Naeini M, Alavi Naeini A. Prioritizing Different Methods for Participation and Education of People to Predict and Warning Flood in Iran. Environmental Management Hazards. 2019 Sep 23;6(3):259-69. [Persian].
[25]. Rokn AE, Pour T, Sadeghloo T, Sajasi H. Analyzing of people attitude to reduction the effect of natural disaster (flood) in rural area with emphasis on participatory management. 2011. [Persian].
[26]. Taheri Behbahani M, Bozorgzadeh M. Urban floods. Center for Urban and Architecture Studies and Research. 1996;89-91. [Persian]
[27]. Valibeigi M, Feshari M, Zivari F, Motamedi A. How to improve public participation in disaster risk management: A case study of Buein Zahra, a small city in Iran. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies. 2019;11(1):1-9.
Iranian journal of Ecohydrology
Volume 8, Issue 3
October 2021
Pages 667-676

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 January 2021
  • Revise Date: 12 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 15 June 2021
  • First Publish Date: 13 July 2021
  • Publish Date: 23 September 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics