Simulation and Evaluation of River Habitat Suitability using SEFA Ecohydraulic Model (Case Study: Kordan River)

Document Type : Research Article


1 M.Sc, Water Structures Engineering Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran

2 Professor, Water Structures Engineering Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran

3 Associate Professor, Irrigation & Reclamation Eng. Department, Tehran University, Tehran


The main objective of this study is to investigate habitat suitability in a representative reach of the Kordan River for aquatic species (Oxynoemacheilus bergianus) using the SEFA ecohydraulic model. According to a study conducted so far, this software has not been used in Iran.  First, using the topographic map of the Kordan River and ArcGIS software, the geometry of the river model and cross sections was created. Hydraulic calculations and simulations in this model including simulation of water levels were conducted using two methods of rating curve and Water Surface Profile (WSP). The calibration of the WSP model is adjusted by the Manning's coefficient to establish a suitable fit between the observed and calculated water levels. In addition to hydraulic simulations in the SEFA model, the relationship between hydraulic flow and habitat requirements was established using the Area-Weighted Suitability (AWS) and Q-AWS curves of target species were extracted at the studied intervals and transverse sections. the best flow assessed (2.05 – 2.63 m3/s) for target species were identified. According to the flow and AWS monthly time series, in January the AWS in 75% of the days is above 2.03 m2/m which is the highest AWS compared to other months. The lowest percentage of AWS is 13% (in September). The results showed that AWS is higher in the middle and downstream reaches of the river.


[1]. Milhous RT, Wegner DL, Waddle T. User''s guide to the physical habitat simulation system (PHABSIM). Department of the Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service; 1984.
[2]. Bovee KD. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Western Energy and Land Use Team, Office of Biological Services, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior; 1982.
[3]. Bovee KD, Lamb BL, Bartholow JM, Stalnaker CB, Taylor J. Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Geological Survey Reston Va Biologicalresources Div; 1998.
[4]. Payne TR, Jowett IG. SEFA-Computer software system for environmental flow analysis based on the instream flow incremental methodology. Georgia Institute of Technology.
[5]. Bovee KD, Milhous RT, Turow J. Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: theory and techniques. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Cooperative Instream Flow Service Group; 1978.
[6]. Waddle T. PHABSIM for Windows user''s manual and exercises. 2001.
[7]. Dehzad B, Sima S. Guide to Determining Water Requirements for Aquatic Ecosystems. Vice President of Strategic Planning and Monitoring, Ministry of Energy. 2011. [Persian]
[8]. Annear TC, Conder AL. Relative bias of several fisheries instream flow methods. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 1984 Oct;4(4B):531-9.
[9]. Parasiewicz P, Walker JD. Comparison of MesoHABSIM with two microhabitat models (PHABSIM and HARPHA). River Research and Applications. 2007 Oct;23(8):904-23.
[10]. Hudson HR, Byrom AE, Chadderton WL. A critique of IFIM: instream habitat simulation in the New Zealand context. Wellington: Department of Conservation; 2003 Oct.
[11]. Remshardt WJ, Fisher WL. Effects of variation in streamflow and channel structure on smallmouth bass habitat in an alluvial stream. River Research and Applications. 2009 Jul;25(6):661-74.
[12]. Jowett IG, Payne TR, Milhous RT. SEFA-System for Environmental Flow Analysis. Software Manual. Version. 2014;1.
[13]. Coad BW. Fishes of Canada: an annotated checklist. Accessed online at http://www. briancoad. com/Complete% 20List. htm (revised: 2011-12-12). 2011.
[14]. Taghian H, SHahpouri M, Mohammadi V, Alizadeh A. Biodiversity and Frequency and Distribution of Fish in the River Dinor Ab Kermanshah Province. Iranian Journal of Reproduction and Aquaculture Science. 2016. [Persian]
[15]. Reyhaneh M, Eagderi S, Delaware M. Investigating the effect of climate change on the habitat suitability of the Kordan River-Case study: (Oxynemacheilus bergianus). Iranian Water Resources Research. 2016. [Persian]
[16]. Tabatabaei SN, Segherloo IH, Eagderi S, Faradonbeh MZ. Habitat use of two nemacheilid fish species, Oxynoemacheilus bergianus and Paracobitis sp. in the Kordan River, Iran. Hydrobiologia. 2015;762(1):183-93.
[17]. Tabatabaei SN, Hashemzadeh Segherloo I, Eagderi S, Zamani M. Length‐weight relationships of fish species in Kordan River (Namak Lake basin), Iran. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2015;31(4):800-1.
[18]. Henderson MN. Open channel flow. 1st ed. Canada: Collier Macmillan; 1996.
[19]. Bovee KD. Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the instream flow incremental methodology. National Ecology Center, Division of Wildlife and Contaminant Research, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior; 1986.
[20]. GHambari Mohammadi M. Simulation of River Habitat Suitability Using SEFA Software Model (Case Study: Kordan River). MSc Thesis. Tarbiat modares University. 2018. [Persian]
[21]. Tabatabaei SN, Eagderi S, kaboli M, Javanshir A, Hashemzadeh Segherloo I, Zamani M. Investigation of Environmental Factors Affecting Distribution (Oxynoemacheilus bergianus) in Kordan River. Journal of Fisheries, Iranian Journal of Natural Resource. 2014. [Persian]
[22]. Hajiesmaeili M. Effect of Flow Hydraulic Parameters on Rainbow Trout in the River Using Physical Habitat Simulation Model (PHABSIM). MSc Thesis. Tarbiat modares University. 2014. [Persian]
Volume 7, Issue 2
July 2020
Pages 437-450
  • Receive Date: 23 September 2019
  • Revise Date: 13 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 13 April 2020
  • First Publish Date: 21 June 2020